[vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]In patent disputes, identifying relevant prior art within the invention’s field is crucial for invalidating claims based on misrepresentation.
Client: Braking system manufacturer
Objective: The case study aimed to support our client, XYZ Innovations, in challenging the validity of ABC Solutions’ patent, which was granted due to misleading information provided by ABC Solutions’ representative during the examination process. [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1729272352388{padding-top: 25px !important;}”]
Case Background:
● ABC Solutions filed a patent in 2019 for a novel vehicle braking system using compressed air.
● Despite the cited prior art reference, the firm misled the examiner and secured the patent in 2023.
● XYZ Innovations reviewed their technology and identified ABC Solutions’ patent posed a risk to their product, so they approached us for assistance. [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1729272768592{padding-top: 25px !important;}”]Want to access the complete case study describing how our seasoned IP professionals gather insights by rigorously analyzing patented technology and related documents to support our client in invalidating ABC Solutions‘ claims? [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1729272402493{padding-top: 25px !important;}”]Fill out the form to access the comprehensive case study.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″]
Error: Contact form not found.
[/vc_column][/vc_row]Access Form
PDF not avilable.
